God, Free Will, and Morality: Prolegomena to a Theory of by Robert J. Richman (auth.)

By Robert J. Richman (auth.)

"He [Francis Bacon] writes of technology like a Lord Chan cellor" - William Harvey "Don't say: 'There needs to be anything universal . . . ' - yet glance and spot" Ludwig Wittgenstein within the historical past of western ethical philosophy due to the fact that Plato, there was a pervasive tendency for the ethical theorist to wri~e, in impression, like a scientist, Le. to hunt thoroughly basic prin­ ciples of correct behavior. Of past due, furthermore, there was an try to set forth a conception underlying the final ideas, no longer of correct behavior, admittedly, yet of justice. to ensure, we're occasionally warned that the foundations (which needs to exist?) might be too advanced to be formulated. additionally they won't exist sooner than motion - still, we're informed, they function publications to behavior! One inight argue that Baconian inductivism offers one foundation for skepticism with appreciate to a couple of primary epistemological difficulties. therefore, the skeptic argues, a undeniable end - say, the life of another's discomfort - isn't justified at the foundation of (behavioral) proof both deductively or inductively, and for this reason it isn't justified in any respect. equally, I may still declare, via constructing an impossible average, the quest for exceptionless rules may possibly turn into a resource of ethical skepticism. finally, while con­ fronted with a meant precept designed to justify a selected ix x PREFACE motion, you may ordinarily think a counter-example to the prin­ ciple with no over the top difficulty.

Show description

Read or Download God, Free Will, and Morality: Prolegomena to a Theory of Practical Reasoning PDF

Similar ethics books

The Elements of Justice

What's justice? Questions of justice are questions about what everyone is due, yet what that suggests in perform is dependent upon context. looking on context, the formal query of what individuals are due is replied via rules of barren region, reciprocity, equality, or desire. Justice, therefore, is a constellation of parts that convey a level of integration and cohesion, however the integrity of justice is proscribed, in a fashion that's comparable to the integrity of an area instead of that of a construction.

The Ethics of Immigration

Within the Ethics of Immigration, Joseph Carens synthesizes a life of paintings to discover and light up some of the most urgent problems with our time. Immigration poses sensible difficulties for western democracies and likewise demanding situations the ways that humans in democracies take into consideration citizenship and belonging, approximately rights and tasks, and approximately freedom and equality.

The African American Challenge to Just War Theory: A Christian Approach

During this leading edge remedy of the ethics of battle, Ryan P. Cumming brings classical assets of simply warfare thought into dialog with African American voices. the result's a brand new path in precisely warfare idea that demanding situations dominant interpretations of simply warfare concept via trying to the views of these at the underside of background and politics.

Additional info for God, Free Will, and Morality: Prolegomena to a Theory of Practical Reasoning

Sample text

For, on this use, obligability and substitutability are, in effect, identified, and, on pain of circularity, the presence or absence of one can hardly be adduced as a justification for the presence or absence of the other. Of greater importance for our problem is a claim often explicitly made by soft determinists about the concept of substitutability, namely, that it should be given a hypothetical analysis. On such an analysis, in which 'X could have done otherwise' is equated with 'X would have done otherwise, if __ ' it appears that substitutability is compatible with determinism.

I shall discuss some typical and important views, but I shall make no claim of inclusiveness. I trust, however, that by the end of the next chapter, in which I discuss a recently fashionable attempt to bypass the determinism-indeterminism dichotomy, I shall have made a sufficiently persuasive case for my claim that it is the OES supposition that is the principal obstacle to the acceptance of the obligability claim. Even, however, if I fail to make such a case, I shall still try to show that the OES supposition has only a prima facie plausibility, and that should it finally appear that one must choose between the supposition that 'ought' implies 'can' and the claim that 'ought' and 'ought not' have application, it is clearly rational to opt for the latter.

On his account such behavior i,s the result of desires, and is a manifestation of the agent's character (as opposed to the self which - or who? - is the author of those acts of which duty, not desire, is the prime mover; those acts are free and obligable). , when they render the actions intelligible or predictable, is a question which I shall postpone until the next chapter. As we have seen, this is a point on which Campbell does appear to have been persuaded by determinists. ) not obligable, then the distinction between obligable and non-obligable actions fails completely.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.04 of 5 – based on 25 votes