Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access by Gerhard Sonnert

By Gerhard Sonnert

What determines profitable careers within the box of technology? What are the early symptoms of later mess ups. And particularly, how do girls scientists' occupation paths fluctuate from men's? whereas you may theorize approximately those questions, those that visit the difficulty of an intensive empirical research locate an more and more complicated photo.

Using the biggest database of its style (699 questionnaires and two hundred face-to-face conversations), the authors examine the profession paths of recipients of prestigious postdoctoral fellowships--scientists, engineers, and mathematicians. They define a theoretical framework for realizing the explanations of gender disparities between scientists, attempt the speculation of a gender- particular "glass ceiling," and supply a wealth of pertinent statistical information.

Gender variations in technological know-how Careers unearths that, as institutional legislation replaced, styles of discrimination and exclusion turn into extra sophisticated. regardless of the decline of inflexible gender-role socialization, many social practices persist that lead, on usual and sometimes in counterintuitive methods, to the buildup of dangers for girls scientists. This publication is directed to students within the social sciences, aspiring and practising scientists, and directors drawn to fairness matters.

Show description

Read or Download Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access Study PDF

Similar social sciences books

Das ‘Webersche Moment’: Zur Kontingenz des Politischen

Dr. Kari Palonen ist Professor am division of Political technology der Universität Jyväskylä, Finnland.

The Waltham Book of Human–Animal Interaction. Benefits and Responsibilities of Pet Ownership

Divided into elements, this article brings jointly ancient and present literature detailing the advantages linked to puppy possession, and examines interactions with animals and the way proprietors can emphasize the positives linked to possession and reduce any strength negatives. Chapters specialise in either the mental and social merits linked to human-animal interactions.

Extra info for Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access Study

Example text

For as I have argued over the decades, the cognitive work of science takes place within a slowly changing institutional and structural framework. We must therefore understand such societal aspects of science as its evolving norms, sanctions, stratification, processes of competition, and reward-system if we are to acquire a Page x fuller understanding of such cognitive aspects of science as choices of problems and concepts. Happily, Holton's own method of ''thematic analysis" can serve me well for identifying some sociological themes in this work that are not instantly evident.

Mizruchi Michael Wallace The Editor and Editorial Board gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Robert K. Merton, Columbia University; Michael Wallace, Indiana University; and Maurice Richter, State University of New York at Albany, as expert reviewers of this manuscript. GENDER DIFFERENCES IN SCIENCE CAREERS The Project Access Study GERHARD SONNERT with the assistance ofGERALD HOLTON RUTGERS UNIVERSITY PRESS New Brunswick, New Jersey Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sonnert, Gerhard, 1957- Gender differences in science careers: the Project Access Study /Gerhard Sonnert with the assistance of Gerald Holton.

By helping the young scientists secure prestigious positions or research grants, the senior scientists' prophecy of scientific excellence may become true, even if it was not merited in the beginning. Somewhat ironically, research into the stratifying mechanisms among scientists has complicated the goal of this line of researchdetermining the extent of universalism in science. The Mertonian research program has established the important role of past performance (track record and reputation) and of expected future performance (prophecy of scientific potential).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.48 of 5 – based on 28 votes